PhotoDude.com

The Daily Whim

The Daily Whim

A Photo Gallery With An Attitude

Sun. Dec 31, 2006

I Insist You Have A Happy 2007

It recently came to my attention that December 29th was National Drunk Blogging Day. Or, was it National Blog Drunk Day. Hell, let me go check the link. OK, it was the former, not the latter. At any rate, no one bothered to send me the memo, so I was distressingly sober that day. So I’m making up for it. Right now.

The link. Oh, yeah. It’s from Doug Monroe, a former longtime AJC reporter who has a fine blog called “Peachtree Screed” over at Atlanta Magazine, which has really poor formatting in their RSS feed (hey, drinking does lower your inhibitions!)

Anyway, reading about the festivities as told by Rusty and Shelby, it sounded like fun. And tonight, the champagne put Susan to bed early … and put me to blogging.

Run while you still can.

Oh, it’s not that bad, I’m only on my third glass of champagne. It’s just I’m pretty much a lightweight when it comes to drinking. It wasn’t always that way. During my DJ days, my blood was about 2% peppermint schnapps at times. I’ve closed more than my share of bars. But that was a whole lot of years and brain cells ago. When I was 23, I travelled from Warner Robins to Atlanta with my then wife, Susan Stott, and a couple of friends for New Year’s Eve, where we rented a couple of rooms at the Peachtree Plaza, and saw Mother’s Finest put on a wild show at the Fox Theater to ring in 1981.

25 years later, a night at home with the current wife, Susan Stott v2.0, and some champagne is plenty. When I was 23, if v1.0 has gone to sleep at 10 on New Year’s Eve, I would have been youthfully enraged beyond all reason. How could she do this?!? We had plans!!!

Tonight, I know that 10 is already past her normal bedtime, never mind the champagne. What’s to be mad about? Funny how time changes. I believe they call that “maturity” or something. Yes, I’m 25 years more mature.

Glass four.

Yes, the glasses. I have predator like tendencies when it comes to champagne flutes. Not on purpose. But you put a pair of them in my range, soon enough, I’ll have killed one of them. Suddenly, out of nowhere, my left leg will kick one across the room. I don’t know what it is. But Susan has witnessed it more than once.

Tonight she was getting out our wedding set to rinse them off, and when I walked into the kitchen, she just looked at me and put them up. Yes, it’s that bad. After she went to bed, I finished the glass I had, carefully rinsed it out with an eyedropper … and went to the cabinet to get a plastic cup.

I’m really trying not to kill again. Lawd, if I broke one of these, I’d better get a running head start before morning. And I’ve had too much champagne to run far enough to be effective.

Maybe it has to do with my introduction to champagne. It was in Dixie cups. In the green room after the first performance of a show at the Wake Forest University Theatre. I had won the second male lead, was (barely) 17, and champagne made me feel much different than the only other alcohol to which I’d been exposed, beer. At that young age, I still wasn’t convinced the taste of beer was worth the buzz.

But this champagne stuff, it was pretty kewl! Not served at your average college frat party, though, so I never became much of a drinker in college. Or really at any time in my life. I certainly drank more when I was working as a DJ at a nightclub in Macon (anyone recall Flaming Sally’s?), but that was a relatively brief time.

OK, this “blogging while drunk” thing has a limited appeal. Podcasting, that’s what I should be doing

[Reid tips his chair over due to hysterical ironic laughter]

Am I drunk enough to talk about what a joke I think podcasting is? Sure, why not. Frankly, I’m hard pressed to come up with a less efficient way for me to get information than to first have to make a 20, 30, 40 MB download and then spend 15, 30, or 60 minutes of my life listening to people pretend they’re on the radio, playing bumper music and jingles and otherwise trying to cram one dead medium into one new one.

OK, OK, if you have a long commute each day, I can see how podcasts could be great. I can see in some niche topic areas, a podcast would be the best way to convey information (a blog filled with music reviews, for example). But we’re talking niches within niches.

I didn’t need the Internet to come along and show me that everybody wants to be a DJ. I learned that 25 years ago when I was a program director. I also learned that most people who think they should be on the radio … are wrong.

Don’t give me one, two, three people sitting around talking. If you want to do that, make it a video. Put it on YouTube or something. Let me hear and see. If you are going to do audio only, give me some Theater of the Mind. Use the medium for something more than talk radio.

There. That should have ticked off a goodly number of people. Let there be no doubt, I’m a crusty radio veteran and curmudgeon who is not likely to be inclined to think podcasting is All That like so many do. But I implore you. Be different. Be inventive. Or be video.

Glass five. (I hit c instead of v three times in a row trying to type five … typing is decaying. Deploy spel chek!). Oh my. The bottle is empty. Good thing we forgot to get orange juice for Mimosas tomorrow. Reid would be in trouble then!

Sorry, “I’m the One” by the Average White Band just came over the headphones, and the bass line prevented me from typing. Segue: if I were to make a New Year’s Resolution, which I don’t do, it would be to go get that cheap ass guitar and add it to my collection of Garageband noises. Hell, I already know three chords. And Lawd knows I need another time-sucking vortex.

I’ll also pause to say how pleased I am at the number of working links I’ve placed in this article while drunk.

Segues. That used to be the most fun part of doing an airshift. Creating a three song set with two segues that were as seamless as possible. Before DJ’s dealt in computerized BPM’s, it was just the turntable felt, your fingers, the cue speaker, and your imagination. Like photography, the tools of the industry have changed so much. Unlike photography, the whole radio business has gone to hell in a handbasket. I have to say, I got out at just the right time. If I’d stayed in the radio business, by the early 90’s you would have read about me in the paper … one of those “DJ Barricades Himself in Studio” stories.

Glass empty.

Drunk blogging over. My guess is I’d blow about a 0.12 right now. So I’m going to stop operating heavy machinery, and wish you and yours a Happy New Year.

May 2007 make 2006 look like 2001. I think you’ll need a few glasses of champagne to properly appreciate that statement.


Peanut Gallery

1  Rusty wrote:

Nice work going full-gusto with the drunk blogging. I do feel compelled to take you to task for the anti-podcasting rant since I run a podcast site though (not sure if you knew that, nor if you cared). I’ll save you most of the pitch and just address your criticisms directly…

Frankly, I’m hard pressed to come up with a less efficient way for me to get information than to first have to make a 20, 30, 40 MB download and then spend 15, 30, or 60 minutes of my life listening to people pretend they’re on the radio, playing bumper music and jingles and otherwise trying to cram one dead medium into one new one.

Have you ever transcribed a 20-minute interview? It takes hours if you’re concerned about accuracy. How long would you spend reading an interview that length? About the same as you would listening to it, only your eyes aren’t free to focus on other tasks. So, it’s plenty efficient for both the podcaster and the listener.

As for downloads taking time, podcatching software is no more time-consuming to use than an RSS reader for text. Files download in the background while you do other things.

And I agree with you that people shouldn’t try too hard to imitate the radio with bumpers and jingles and instead try to make podcasts short enough and episodic so that excessive production isn’t necessary to keep people’s attention.

I can see in some niche topic areas, a podcast would be the best way to convey information (a blog filled with music reviews, for example). But we’re talking niches within niches.

Most blogs are niches within niches, so it’s unfair to limit your criticism to podcasts when it should be applied to all consumer-driven media (I view that as a good thing, but I think that argument is outside the scope of this response… we can always have it later if you feel so inclined).

Don’t give me one, two, three people sitting around talking. If you want to do that, make it a video. Put it on YouTube or something. Let me hear and see. If you are going to do audio only, give me some Theater of the Mind. Use the medium for something more than talk radio.

See the above remarks about transcribing and being able to multitask while listening. Audio is less demanding on the audience after you take them over the initial learning curve of getting RSS and podatchers conceptually. Video demands both their eyes and their ears, and so I would argue that you’ve got it backwards: if you’re going to do video, it better have something more compelling than people talking.

But I’m with you in that I would love to hear more theater-of-the-mind stuff. We’ve done a couple of episodes that toy with the concept a little (see: An investigation with the Henry Ghost Hunters and Testing the female condom ) but would love for someone to come on and do a full-blown War of the Worlds sort of thing (hint hint).

Since you were a radio guy, I feel your pain re: listening to bad podcasts. Most professional writers say the same thing about reading bad blogs. And yet people still write them. 90 percent of everything is crap. As the medium gets bigger, more good ones will emerge (along with more crap).

Comment by Rusty · 01/ 1/07 09:02 AM
2  Reid wrote:

I do feel compelled to take you to task for the anti-podcasting rant since I run a podcast site though (not sure if you knew that, nor if you cared)”

I knew. I know there are also Textdrivers who podcast and read this place, among others. These are among the reasons you’ve never heard me critique podcasting before. But I’m sober today. I don’t know what that drunken idiot was talking about last night.

Your points of rebuttal appear to be mostly valid, and at 9:02AM, I would assume there were made in a sober state.

Don’t you know better than to argue with a drunk? It would appear he got your dander up. Just ignore him and let him sleep it off, it’ll be OK…

Comment by Reid · 01/ 1/07 10:08 AM
3  Paul wrote:

I agree with your original view on podcasts, Reid. Unless they feature compelling subject matter (like BBC’s In Our Time), I find them to be a waste of time and talent.

With text, I can scroll fast and find something that looks interesting. I’m the one in control. With podcasts, I have to sit there and listen to people jabber on all day and maybe they might talk about something interesting, but who knows. I’ve found myself shifting forward every few minutes on lots of podcasts, hoping to hear something interesting. Right now, unless it comes from a quality source (NPR, BBC, etc.), I don’t even consider it. Radio professionals are professionals for a reason: they know what they’re doing and how to make something interesting and entertaining. They also have voices that are trained for the medium.

Now if someone could come up with a good radio show, like a variety hour or a dramatic/comedic serial, I’d give it a chance.

Comment by Paul · 01/ 1/07 03:13 PM
4  rturner wrote:

I think my site must need podcasts, yeah, that’s the ticket. As I too have a serious phobia of glass, reading about the champagne stem was like chalk scratching a board, I knew as soon as I’d pick one up it would snap in two. Plastic cups and coffee cups are just fine, although a year ago I picked up a coffee cup which proceeded to crack against my palm, requiring stitches. Geez, I need to change the subject. I was working on a six pack of something called “Red Brick” last night and watching a marathon thing about 20th century battles on the military channel. Which is a pretty weird way for me to spend an evening, much less New Year’s. Last time I went out to a party, driving home, I swerved at the last minute on 285 to avoid a car parked in the middle lane with its lights off. I called 911, but I have no idea if anyone hit it before the cops got there. There, enough New Year’s rambling responses from me.

Comments are closed for this article
Contact me to find out more