Sat. Sep 03, 2005
Over Capacity
While I suggested people Shut Up And Give as part of the web-wide effort to raise funds on Thursday, I think it’s now more appropriate to call it “Katrina’s Cuss Jar.” After all, a Cuss Jar is used after the cuss, not so much to stop it, but to generate something good out of it. And though I believe in focusing on Priority One, helping those still at risk, there’s at least one larger lesson we can draw from this, as individuals. And families.
Specific accountability? Sure I’d like some, but I still don’t think we’re quite there yet when so many are still at risk. When your house is still on fire, you don’t spend time chastising the electrician for the bad wiring, you devote your energy where it is needed, and saddle up the lawyers later. There will be plenty of time, reams of assessments, and probably some investigative committee to detail who did or didn’t do what. All we know for sure now is that it started as an Act of God, and I’m sure He’ll be publicly censured as well.
But some things are already clear to me. In a few days, people will begin ruminating on the fourth anniversary of 9/11. Remember on September 12th when we were all New Yorkers? Has anyone even thought the same thing about New Orleans? Remember after 9/11 when members of Congress gathered on the Capitol steps to sing “God Bless America”? They hurried back on a Sunday night from a vacation to pass a bill for Terri Schiavo, but could only bring themselves to knock a couple of days off this vacation and return five days after the storm hit the Gulf Coast.
Remember that brief shining moment when it seemed like maybe we could pull together as a people, when we all saw our fellow Americans face such a clear and obvious disaster? When it seemed like maybe the government would do things at all levels to improve our state of preparedness for disaster, since we now saw just how bad it could be?
Nearly four years after that brief shining moment, we got a national capacity test. A big one. It came with some warning, though not much. It was a natural event that was certainly not unexpected, in fact, many called it inevitable.
And we failed that national capacity test, on every level. Federal, state, local … and personal. The tri-level governmental failure will be dissected to death and beyond, and there is surely plenty of blame to go around, on both sides of the aisle, going back a long ways. We’ll get to that.
But what about us, you know, as a people. Americans. Can I still use that term? I don’t know, some might find it offensive these days. My apologies. At any rate, after 9/11, the diversity that is this nation pulled together in amazing ways and responded to the tragedy we all saw. Sure, many had questions, and we all wanted answers, but there it wasn’t an immediate consideration … that can wait for later, the rubble is still burning and people may still be in there. This time, in less than five days, with tens of thousands still at risk, we’ve compiled a long list of blame and finger pointing.
Today, we still pull together quickly, but not in the same way at all, in my opinion. Very quickly, disturbingly quickly, we pull into at least three distinct clumps, one red, one blue, and one, I don’t know, brownish like most humans. Note, in this case those red and blue clumps were not as big as you usually see them, and the brownish clump was bigger than both of them. I’d guesstimate the split at 20-20-60, this time. It varies widely by issue and event.
So, it’s a gathering, of sorts. But it sure ain’t like it used to be. Because these multiple clumps may appear to have somewhat similar goals on the surface, but their methods and motivations are diabolically opposed, especially the red and blue ones.
And that’s not new, it’s just not what one might have predicted or hoped for after 9/11. It’s just the last part of this lesson. Not only is it likely your government will fail you, your fellow Americans may expend as much energy on partisan bickering as they do on your relief.
Almost all of us live at some risk of a disaster, whether it’s a hurricane, an earthquake, a swarm of tornados, or a major terrorist attack. And the lesson of New Orleans is that if the worst befalls your city, you’re on your own.
You may not have fully comprehended this before now. But they knew it (emphasis mine):
Each time you hear a federal, state or city official explain what he or she is doing to help New Orleans, consider the opening paragraphs of a July 24 story in the New Orleans Times-Picayune.
“City, state and federal emergency officials are preparing to give the poorest of New Orleans’ poor a historically blunt message: In the event of a major hurricane, you’re on your own.”
“In scripted appearances being recorded now, officials such as Mayor Ray Nagin, local Red Cross Executive Director Kay Wilkins and City Council President Oliver Thomas drive home the word that the city does not have the resources to move out of harm’s way an estimated 134,000 people without transportation.”
AJC: No plan ever made to help New Orleans’ most vulnerable
That was over a month before Katrina. They knew this storm was inevitable, they knew the city’s levees would be unable to keep the water out (though they now claim surprise that the levees failed ... over the top, or via breach, the end result was the same, deep floods), they knew over 100,000 people would be unable to evacuate, and they knew those people would be on their own.
Today, none of us can claim it’s a secret anymore.
The previously prudent 3 to 5 days of non-perishable food, water, batteries, and flashlights could be just enough to extend your suffering. It used to be considered enough to tide you over until relief arrived. I think anyone with a TV to watch and two brain cells to rub together would agree that’s no longer a safe assumption.
And think about the next time. Another scenario most “experts” claim is “inevitable” is some type of terrorist attack with a nuclear, chemical, or biological weapon that causes mass casualties. Does the medical system of New Orleans, the surrounding area, and the federal “responders” look like it’s able to care for the injured and sick? Or even remove the dead? How does the surge capacity of our country’s medical system look in a mass emergency? How does our nation’s capacity to quickly restore law and order to protect the victims look right now?
If we’re attacked, there will be no warning allowing the evacuation of 80% of the population, nor will there be any argument that those people were too stupid to leave (though I bet you’ll hear that next time if it’s New York). No pre-declaring it a disaster area so you can get things prepositioned like this time.
And what if it comes in the next few weeks? What if there’s another 9/11, or, even more likely, another Category 4 or 5 hurricane roaring ashore somewhere else? You will be so very on your own.
Look at the people you see on TV, now in Day Six left with little more than the clothes on their back, and the three bottles of water and MRE’s some of them have been given. In addition to lacking the evidence we all now see, and they now experience, most of these people probably couldn’t begin to stockpile supplies for a lengthy emergency before this hurricane hit.
Maybe you can’t either. Times have been tough for many lately, including us here at Bunker PD. But if you can, learn from this, and remember that if disaster hits your city … you’re on your own.
For a while.
Published 12:52PM, Sat, Sep 03 2005
Category: News Events Terrorism
Previous: «« Shut Up And Give ««
Next: »» Katrina's Collateral Damage »»
Peanut Gallery
I sometimes wonder if people are not reacting to New Orleans in the same way as New York because the response to 9-11 was anger – mostly. Compassion for many Americans took a back seat to rage. We collected money and rebounded to show “them” that they couldn’t beat us.
New Orleans, on the other hand, is really too big to put into a sound bite. We can’t get our brains wrapped around the tragedy of it all. The land mass affected is so large and the number of people involved is so staggering that people simply tune out.
Plus, as you pointed out, the present anger is not about an enemy on the outside, it is about apathetic government and the citizens that endorsed the apathy through elections.
Or possibly New Orleans is just too hard to look at. Some just find it easier to turn the channel.
But every city should now take a close look at some what-if scenarios.
I think every individual should now take a close look at some what-if scenarios. Like, “what-if the worst happens, and my city government completely fails me?” And “what if the power goes out, and almost all roads out are blocked, and no ‘official’ help is forthcoming … for six days?”
And I understand what you’re saying about the “anger” people felt at an external force after 9/11. But I have to be honest. After seeing the partisan reactions to this disaster from both sides, I have no doubt that if New York got nuked, within 48 hours a significant number would have descended into blame. Internal blame, not at the external actors. We’ve become poisonously divided, even in the face of disaster.
I’ve watched and cried over the past 72 hours, and feel like I’ve seen every hope I ever had for this country after 9/11 drowned in the attic of a shotgun shack in New Orleans.
I think that the divisions have always been there and have always been unfreindly. The difference between now and the past, I think, is a lack of national identity. Or maybe a common purpose, or for the cynical it would be a common enemy. Not long ago, and for a long time we were about facing down communism. Before that, WWII etc. We fractured before in the 1960’s and early 70’s. I know I am rambling a bit, but still I see some historical perspective. In other words I don’t think that things have changed so much. I think that at some times in our history differences take a higher priority than similarities. We have been very busy celebrating what makes us different for a long time now. In education we must “celebrate” all differences. Fine. But when do we celebrate common good?
I think that a little nationalism is a good thing. A 4th of July that celebrates the common good of our nation – without the requiste a list of every mistake the country has made would be a nice start.
This next 4th will be special for at least one little girl who will grow up in a world with freedom. I think we will be celebrating that. Cheer up freind. We won’t wait ‘til then to cook up some dead meat!
I hope that the very public failure failure of nearly every aspect of our society over the past week will alert people to the fundamental reason that we have dissent and political debate in the first place: the objective is not to score points, it is to solve problems. We haven’t done that in the four years since 9-11, and we see where it has gotten us.
Culturally, I hope that the images we’ve seen over the past week will alert people to the ongoing problem of poverty in our society and why it matters. Yes, the ghetto is thankfully not what it was in 1989, but crushing poverty still exists. Now that N.O. is empty, we should start seeing the cameras venturing into tiny towns in Mississippi and Southern Louisiana. This happened in the worst possible place: one of the poorest major U.S. cities, with one of the chronically poorest city governments in the poorest part of the country.
The most encouraging thing I have seen in the past week is the news-people spending some effort on actually reporting what was going on, and standing up to politicians and spin-meisters who wanted to obscure it. It was as if they really believed that journalists should do something besides manage the he-said she-said.
This is too large to examine which side of our pre-Katrina political debate gets an advantage. Rather, it has rendered our pre-Katrina political debate utterly worthless. The debate that ensues will be an entirely different thing.
It is too much to ask that this tribulation has the same cultural effect on us that the Battle of Britain had in the U.K. But perhaps it will be enough to make people realize that there is a reason we have these debates, and its not just about colors on a map and letters before elected official’s names.
I sometimes wonder if people are not reacting to New Orleans in the same way as New York because the response to 9-11 was anger – mostly. Compassion for many Americans took a back seat to rage. We collected money and rebounded to show “them� that they couldn’t beat us.
I think the reaction is exactly the same as 9-11, except the anger is being placed on the government and its politicians, because that’s all there is to blame. On 9-11, actual people representing other people overseas attacked us. We got mad at them and their supporters. With this, who can you get mad at? A hurricane? Nope, you get mad at the response to the tragedy, not the cause of it.
I think the “on your own” philosophy is right on. I think every institution that can fail us has failed us these past few years.



Reid,
Two words: avian influenza.