Wed. Dec 08, 2004
Soulless in Manhattan
A little of the magic of Manhattan, a rare piece supplied by Mother Nature, was intentionally destroyed yesterday.
Pale Male the city hawk was evicted from his nest on Tuesday, and the flap has already begun.
So said aggrieved bird-watchers and neighbors after workmen — under cover of a dismally rainy day when almost no one was looking — raised a scaffold to the top of a Fifth Avenue apartment house, ripped out the famous red-tailed hawk’s nest and carted it off in a van.
The act appeared to end an urban drama that has fascinated long-time bird-watchers and recruited many more to their ranks over the past nine years, as Pale Male and a succession of mates raised 25 chicks — the last trio of fledglings last June — on the narrow 12th floor ledge.
The hawks also achieved a measure of world fame, through television specials and a book, “Red-Tails in Love.” Audubon society experts say that while the raptors are no strangers to city life, they normally nest in trees, and there is no previous record of a pair taking up permanent residence on a high-rise building.
A doorman at the building said it was managed by Brown Harris Stevens, a prominent Manhattan real estate firm. At the company office, an employee declined to comment.
Newsday: City Hawks evicted from Fifth Avenue nest
I first learned of Pale Male from a PBS special, and if the story of this red tailed hawk’s struggle and success in the Big Apple didn’t move you, well, you have no heart. No soul. No cognizance of the world that surrounds you, or wonder at its marvels, just a desire to shape it to your whims.
At this point, it’s hard to determine the blame here. Brown Harris Stevens is supposedly the company that owns and manages the building. Their home page shows they specialize in properties in Manhattan, the Hamptons, and Palm Beach. Their clientele is the upper class. How many Sierra Club or Audubon Society members are among their clients? How many rich people angrily throwing their money around will it take for Brown Harris Stevens to realize the error of their ways?
But it may be specific to this building. Apparently the board of directors for 927 Fifth Avenue decided that the problem of bird droppings (and the occasional pigeon carcass) meant the nest had to go … after nine years in place. After becoming so well known even this distant Georgia Boy is pissed about its removal. There are no laws protecting red tailed hawks or their nests in Manhattan, and there is little doubt the board has the right to do whatever it wants with its building.
But just because something is legal does not mean it is moral, ethical, or simply “right.” If you reduce the matter to simple legalities, as is your right, there are other consequences when you proceed. You will have assured that the path of the comfortable man will not be sullied by a mere bird, and by staking that priority, you’ve marked yourself.
You will have a sidewalk clean of bird droppings (because, of course, Pale Male was the only defecating bird in Manhattan), but you will be left with no soul. You will have a clear cornice above that window, but you will be left with no heart.
You will have cleaned a few square feet of a building, and removed some of the magic of Manhattan. You will have “protected” your “home” by evicting one of God’s creations, a living example of the mysterious ways in which He works. A speck of marvel in Manhattan. And you wiped it clean.
You even made Mary Tyler Moore mad (she lives in the building): “I am so outraged that they would do this without so much as a by your leave [...] This was something we like to talk about: a kinder, gentler world, and now it’s gone.””
May a million pigeons rest on your roof, and dump their offal on you daily.
Later: Bastards “The building’s management company said of the nest removal, ‘It was a researched and thought-out decision on the part of the building’ [...] On Wednesday, Pale Male and Lola, his female companion, could be seen circling the building and bringing back twigs to try to rebuild the nest, which bird watchers said would be futile without the metal spikes to support it.”
Even Later: Brian W. Carver suggests there may be a law that covers this.
And More: NY Daily News “The co-op board, which sources say is headed by developer Richard Cohen, husband of CNN newswoman Paula Zahn, contacted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which said the co-op could get rid of the nest as long as there were no chicks or eggs inside. Neither Cohen nor Zahn could be reached for comment.” There are times I wish I was a very rich person, too. Because that would allow me the funds to have a truckload of manure dumped on the steps of 927 Fifth Avenue (“sure, officer, I’ll pay the fine”). Or perhaps a release of 500 pigeons. But since I’m not rich, I’ll simply turn off CNN every time I see Paula Zahn’s face.
Published 12:32PM, Wed, Dec 08 2004
Category: Cultural Commentary News Events
Previous: «« A Day of Infamy and Reform ««
Next: »» Deconstructing The Machine »»
Peanut Gallery
can’t really put it back, can you?
It’s even worse than that. There had been some iron spikes on top of the cornice that the hawks had used to anchor their nest in the winds as it was built.
They removed the spikes, too.
I would argue that if you can’t deal with a little bird poop and an occasional dead body, Manhattan is not the place for you to live. Most New Yorkers are a helluva lot tougher than the people who did this.
It looks to me like these people knew there would be bad publicity, and have decided they can wait it out. Money provides a lot of insulation, apparently. But since the NY Audubon Society has “had ‘very little success getting through’ to the co-op’s board or residents” you have to reach out and touch them in whatever way you can.
When I read that “The co-op board … is headed by developer Richard Cohen, husband of CNN newswoman Paula Zahn” I went to the appropriate Contact Us page at CNN, and sent the following:
– 0 –
I’ve just read today that Paula Zahn not only lives in the Manhattan building that “evicted” the red tailed hawk “Pale Male’s” nest, her husband heads the board that made the decision. The board and tenants in that building have shut themselves off to public feedback about this horrid act. So I will be forced to take it out on CNN, by proxy. Whenever Paula Zahn’s face appears on CNN, my TV will find a new channel. I certainly expect CNN to take no action over this, but if you would pass on to Ms. Zahn and her husband, such heartless acts leave a stench that lingers, from which you cannot hide.
– 0 –
It seems clear that the folks at 927 Fifth Avenue figure their money and property rights trump Pale Male’s (nine years doesn’t constitute squatter’s rights, or a common law marriage with the building, or something?). One can only hope to intrude on their comfortable construct, and sadly, from hundreds of miles away, the above is about all I can do. I’m hoping others can do more.
But it looks like Pale Male and Lola will have to try and build a new nest somewhere nearby. When that last happened, it was two years before Pale Male bred again.
Removing the nest will not stop nature from providing for these creatures. They’ll find another spot, and hopefully it’ll be in a better place, where they’ll be more welcome. If nothing else, maybe the birds will wise up and leave New York.
This kinda reminded me of a neighbor I had once, who got all bothered by the situation at my backyard birdfeeder- it was the hangout for a ton of little birds and one cooper’s hawk, who would occasionally swoop in and peg some unsuspecting sparrow. My neighbor witnessed this, and threw a hissy- told me I “had to do something to save the birds!” My reply was simple- “Hey, I’m feeding birds. ALL the birds. This is nature, deal with it.”
Hawks = cool.
wise up and leave New York.
amen, brother!
...
(and if they were people, I’m pretty sure they would have a prescriptive easement after seven years.)
How would you like a gigantic hawk’s nest on top of your house? It’s called private property rights. The Hawk will survive.
Although it remains to be seen whether removal of the nest was really legal, it was morally despicable; the people who did this don’t have any heart. In lieu of bird droppings, I hope Santa’s reindeer will remember to drop off some presents of their own as they pass over the building in a couple of weeks.
i prefer to watch pale male and lola anytime over paula zahns insipid program. she could have used her influence but her “celebrity” and wealth must be more important to her than a beautiful spectacle of nature. What a sad commentary on our culture of materialism and artificiality
Hi, I live in New York and am blogging about pale Male. I’d like to link to your post about this.
Thanks,
Ingrid
Paula Zahn used to be on a station in my hometown, the Quad Cities. I no longer consider her a local person who “made it.” I’ll make sure that all the local “greens” know about this…



...and may the rat population, (some of them in NYC as big as possums and farm cats), find a new, safe, preditor-free habitat as winter approaches.