Mon. Sep 30, 2002
Checkin' in with Elvis bin Laden
Back in December and again in July, I reviewed the state of Elvis bin Laden. Being October, I guess it’s time again.
First, we have the New York Times, once again confirming my year end lament: "The frustrations for American troops have not been helped by the suspicion that here at Tora Bora, where Mr. bin Laden was all but trapped, indecisiveness on the part of American commanders, or perhaps reluctance to risk casualties, may have helped him escape. If he fled to Pakistan, he did so over snow-choked mountain trails that were not blocked by American or other allied troops until after the bombing an oversight that some of the allies point to as having squandered the best opportunity of the war to snare America’s most wanted man."
"Within weeks, high-ranking British officers were saying privately that American commanders had vetoed a proposal to guard the high-altitude trails, arguing that the risks of a firefight, in deep snow, gusting winds and low-slung clouds, were too high…."
"....An Afghan commander who held part of the front line at Tora Bora, Alim Shah Qaderi, said he had been told of one last sighting of Mr. bin Laden, at the village of Tangi, close to the Pakistan border, on Dec. 8, shortly before the bombing ended. Villagers there, Mr. Qaderi said, had told him that a man who looked like the Qaeda leader, along with a group of about 20 other Arabs, had ridden into Tangi on horseback late that day, paused for water and to buy supplies, and then ridden on toward Pakistan."
"Mr. Qaderi, now back to a civilian life in Jalalabad as chief of the city’s creaky telephone service, said he had remained at Tora Bora for weeks after the bombing, working with American search teams. But those teams, he said, had left many collapsed caves unsearched, had photographed but not DNA-tested bodies still lying on the mountains, and had not dug up many of the Arab graves that were left on the higher ridges, marked by white flags that were an Islamic banner for Al Qaeda and the Taliban."
" ‘So my final word is this,’ the commander said. ‘If Osama is dead, somebody has to prove it, and they haven’t. And if he’s alive, he won’t stay out of sight forever. So what can the Americans do but to keep on searching?’ "
Sounds like a bit more of the “nobody knows for sure, but….” the general consensus leans towards “chronically immobile.”
Rowan Scarborough, of The Washington Times, reports similar rumblings in DC: "An increasing number of government analysts believe Osama bin Laden is dead, but the assessment is based on rational deduction, not hard evidence. Interviews with Bush administration officials in recent weeks show an increasing shift in opinion to the ”’o longer with us’ column when it comes to Washington’s No. 1 guessing game, ‘Dead or Alive?’ "
"The arguments that bin Laden is dead:
· Bin Laden has an enormous ego, and with it, a need to appear in public [...] “He has too big an ego to stay quiet this long,” said a senior military officer.
· It is easier to hide bin Laden’s death than his life. This argument goes that if bin Laden did die in the battle of Tora Bora, it is likely that it happened with the knowledge of only a few top aides. They have steadfastly guarded their secret to keep al Qaeda terrorists from becoming dispirited.
· Al Qaeda supporters have put out videotapes of anti-Western speeches by bin Laden, claiming that they are new. U.S. analysts say all tapes since December are old. Some surmise that al Qaeda is putting out phony tapes to cover up bin Laden’s death."
I would simply note we are coming up on Oct. 7, the one year anniversary of the launch of our campaign in Afghanistan, a year during which bin Laden was only been heard from in the first two months. That ten month silence should be a fair indicator on the day of that anniversary; though fragments of Al Qaeda remain, the campaign against them in Afghnistan was successful, and for all practical purposes, bin Laden is dead.
Previous: «« Re-Raising Hell ««
Next: »» Dissent Requires Accuracy »»
Peanut Gallery


"That ten month silence should be a fair indicator on the day of that anniversary; though fragments of Al Qaeda remain, the campaign against them in Afghnistan was successful, and for all practical purposes, bin Laden is dead." Right on Ried, I hear this bull flop argument that 'We need to be SURE' Bin Laden is dead before we move on to fighting terrorism in other places. We need to be sure? What the heck does that mean? Should we excavate every suspected cave sight one mile deep. The inference here is that we can't hold Saddam to santions he agreed to because we are involved with a puzzle. Whether we have done the dirty deed or not, we have removed every practacle means of power from a person who is as likely dead as he is alive. His followers continue to be rounded up, (remeber those statements saying if Bin Laden was attacked a thousand Bin Ladens would appear?) and all indications are that the opperation against Al Queda is going ahead smoothly. To say we can't hold Saddam accountable because we don't know about Bin Laden makes me wonder if THIS is the central congressional Gorebonian website for pertanate military strategy.